Another Carey Parody
Sing a song of Mike Pence patterned after Sing a Song of Sixpence
Sing a song of Mike Pence Hillary’s full of lies
When her emails opened they were full of crimes
Wasn't that a splendid way to go before the court
Wiping out her server ‘n Benghazi no support
Tim Kaine was in his common wealth counting on some money
Hillary was in recovery eating pills and honey
The media was in the garbage hanging out the clothes
When down came a Donald and pecked off her nose!
Carey Masci
Showing posts with label Clinton. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Clinton. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 05, 2016
Saturday, December 03, 2011
The Decision
Today we will find out whether Herman Cain decides to continue his run for the White House or pack it in. I am not a Cain fan because I do not think he is knowledgeable enough for the world stage, his past endorsement of Romney and today’s pr event of whether he will stay in but none the less I find it troubling with what is going on with our system. Politics have always been dirty but has America hit a new low?
In the 70's we had Nixon trying to get dirt on the Democrats with the Watergate break in. In the early 90's Ross Perot ended his bid for presidency when rumors surfaced that the Republican party planned on sabotaging Perot's daughters wedding. And now we have Cain.
The only candidate I know of that escaped infidelity charges was Slick Willy Clinton. In the 80's we had Gary Hart and he quickly became a casualty when it came to light of his cheating. And during the the 2008 election John Edwards sunk when it was revealed he got a woman pregnant. But with Cain this seems to be different. Herman's accusers do not seem the most credible but so much dirt has been thrown around and the waters have been so muddied that Cain could repeatedly say he is innocent but will we ever know the truth or trust him completely? It doesn't take a lot to character assassinate someone, doubt will always linger even if proven innocent.
Something really needs to be done with our campaigning and election process. NO one is perfect, most of us have a past and to some its a past we like to forget. But how far back into ones past do we have to go to see if a candidate qualifies to our standards? To me the time line is ten to fifteen years which I believe is sufficient to set a pattern of behavior. So the previous charges again Cain were a non factor as far as I am concerned but this supposed current affair has been going on thirteen years, that's worrisome.
It is unsettling because if we back the man and we find out these charges are true then the Republican party, the party of Value Voters, the Christian Conservative Right are no better than when the Democrats elected Clinton while the talk of his womanizing was going that continued right into the Oval Office. Do we really need this all over again?
On the other hand if we do not support Cain and then we find out that the charges were trumped up by the establishment, the insiders, the opposition, or by whomever then they won and damaged a mans reputation and maybe a person who would of done an admirable job as president and this could even discourage others in the future of running.
I myself will be watching Cain's decision. If he decides to end his campaign I will pay attention to whom he endorses. If he endorses someone such as Mitt Romney who is very soft on social issues and changed his position on so many others then I think I can draw a positive conclusion of what happened.
Carey Masci
In the 70's we had Nixon trying to get dirt on the Democrats with the Watergate break in. In the early 90's Ross Perot ended his bid for presidency when rumors surfaced that the Republican party planned on sabotaging Perot's daughters wedding. And now we have Cain.
The only candidate I know of that escaped infidelity charges was Slick Willy Clinton. In the 80's we had Gary Hart and he quickly became a casualty when it came to light of his cheating. And during the the 2008 election John Edwards sunk when it was revealed he got a woman pregnant. But with Cain this seems to be different. Herman's accusers do not seem the most credible but so much dirt has been thrown around and the waters have been so muddied that Cain could repeatedly say he is innocent but will we ever know the truth or trust him completely? It doesn't take a lot to character assassinate someone, doubt will always linger even if proven innocent.
Something really needs to be done with our campaigning and election process. NO one is perfect, most of us have a past and to some its a past we like to forget. But how far back into ones past do we have to go to see if a candidate qualifies to our standards? To me the time line is ten to fifteen years which I believe is sufficient to set a pattern of behavior. So the previous charges again Cain were a non factor as far as I am concerned but this supposed current affair has been going on thirteen years, that's worrisome.
It is unsettling because if we back the man and we find out these charges are true then the Republican party, the party of Value Voters, the Christian Conservative Right are no better than when the Democrats elected Clinton while the talk of his womanizing was going that continued right into the Oval Office. Do we really need this all over again?
On the other hand if we do not support Cain and then we find out that the charges were trumped up by the establishment, the insiders, the opposition, or by whomever then they won and damaged a mans reputation and maybe a person who would of done an admirable job as president and this could even discourage others in the future of running.
I myself will be watching Cain's decision. If he decides to end his campaign I will pay attention to whom he endorses. If he endorses someone such as Mitt Romney who is very soft on social issues and changed his position on so many others then I think I can draw a positive conclusion of what happened.
Carey Masci
Friday, December 17, 2010
From tax cuts to 2012
Well is everyone having fun watching the game of chess being played in Washington? If you haven't figured out what is going on let me give you my take.
In short, both sides are already campaigning for the 2012 election. Lets take a closer look at this.
Don't you find it a bit strange that the unemployment benefits that were extended ran out the same time the Bush tax cuts were about to end? Some timing huh?
I have to call the Republicans out first because quite frankly I am tired of the games while my country burns. Lets go back at least the last 4 or 5 elections, probably more. What was the battle cry? You have to elect Republicans to stop the homosexual agenda, we kept hearing about Christian/Conservative causes. Did they do anything while they held majority? Nope. Now it seems they got all the mileage they could out of that and its not that big of a battle cry anymore especially when former first lady Laura Bush says she is OK with same sex marriage.
The new carrot being dangled is tax cuts. You need to elect us to keep the tax cuts in place. They used this in the last election and will continue to use it. If not, why aren't the Repubs in power doing all they can to stall until the newly elected reserves will add to the GOP numbers and instead of a two year extension fight to make the tax cuts permanent? Am I missing something?
And on the other side we are now hearing Pres. Obama say we need to work together and compromise. Where was this talk while his socialist agenda was being pushed on us? Now we need to work together?
Furthermore, Obama promised change but he is using an old playbook, even had to call Bill Clinton in to steady his ship. He realized that he lost a major battle in the November elections. So Obama had to back track, surrender and in 2012 will come out as a moderate and say I extended the tax cuts and lengthened unemployment benefits. Brilliant. The dog and pony show the far left is putting on is just that. They need to keep their liberal/ socialist base happy by fanning the flames of class warfare - tax the rich, give to the poor!
They understand the game plan is almost the same one Slick used. Have the president look and act some what moderate but underneath keep the liberal plan in tact. What they will do is hinder, block and try to make life hell for the GOP. If they could make enough Repubs compromise and screw up, the Conservative Right voters will stay home and whamo we are back to square one and the Left will be back with a vengeance. Every time the Dems get in power its a slow tightening of the noose as more of our liberties are weakened or taken away.
So really nothing has changed maybe the new comers will be different but as of now both parties are up to the same old same old. Its all about winning elections and 2012 rather than doing what is right for this country.
Look at the Blue Dog Democrats that lost. Obama trys to spin it as they lost because they were too moderate and not following the liberal agenda. The truth is the Blue Dogs lost because the Democratic Party did not support their reelection. But hold on, the same scenario played out in the Republican Party. The GOP could of won a few more seats if they would of backed some of the Tea Party candidates as Christine O'Donnell. She didn't follow the establishment plan and they didn't back her.
Which brings us from tax cuts to the 2012 election and who the nominees for president will be. But I know you hate reading anything to long so you will have to wait until my next email.
Carey Masci
In short, both sides are already campaigning for the 2012 election. Lets take a closer look at this.
Don't you find it a bit strange that the unemployment benefits that were extended ran out the same time the Bush tax cuts were about to end? Some timing huh?
I have to call the Republicans out first because quite frankly I am tired of the games while my country burns. Lets go back at least the last 4 or 5 elections, probably more. What was the battle cry? You have to elect Republicans to stop the homosexual agenda, we kept hearing about Christian/Conservative causes. Did they do anything while they held majority? Nope. Now it seems they got all the mileage they could out of that and its not that big of a battle cry anymore especially when former first lady Laura Bush says she is OK with same sex marriage.
The new carrot being dangled is tax cuts. You need to elect us to keep the tax cuts in place. They used this in the last election and will continue to use it. If not, why aren't the Repubs in power doing all they can to stall until the newly elected reserves will add to the GOP numbers and instead of a two year extension fight to make the tax cuts permanent? Am I missing something?
And on the other side we are now hearing Pres. Obama say we need to work together and compromise. Where was this talk while his socialist agenda was being pushed on us? Now we need to work together?
Furthermore, Obama promised change but he is using an old playbook, even had to call Bill Clinton in to steady his ship. He realized that he lost a major battle in the November elections. So Obama had to back track, surrender and in 2012 will come out as a moderate and say I extended the tax cuts and lengthened unemployment benefits. Brilliant. The dog and pony show the far left is putting on is just that. They need to keep their liberal/ socialist base happy by fanning the flames of class warfare - tax the rich, give to the poor!
They understand the game plan is almost the same one Slick used. Have the president look and act some what moderate but underneath keep the liberal plan in tact. What they will do is hinder, block and try to make life hell for the GOP. If they could make enough Repubs compromise and screw up, the Conservative Right voters will stay home and whamo we are back to square one and the Left will be back with a vengeance. Every time the Dems get in power its a slow tightening of the noose as more of our liberties are weakened or taken away.
So really nothing has changed maybe the new comers will be different but as of now both parties are up to the same old same old. Its all about winning elections and 2012 rather than doing what is right for this country.
Look at the Blue Dog Democrats that lost. Obama trys to spin it as they lost because they were too moderate and not following the liberal agenda. The truth is the Blue Dogs lost because the Democratic Party did not support their reelection. But hold on, the same scenario played out in the Republican Party. The GOP could of won a few more seats if they would of backed some of the Tea Party candidates as Christine O'Donnell. She didn't follow the establishment plan and they didn't back her.
Which brings us from tax cuts to the 2012 election and who the nominees for president will be. But I know you hate reading anything to long so you will have to wait until my next email.
Carey Masci
Thursday, February 07, 2008
Interesting facts and my observations of the '08 presidential race.
In Florida two things stood out.
Mitt received more votes from the Evangelicals then Mike Huckabee. Christian and Value Voters are buying the lie from the media and Romney's own ads that paint him as a social conservative. He isn't! Look into his record as Governor, only recently he changed. Mitt's Mother who ran for senate in Michigan was a pro-choice Republican. And do I even need to mention again his pro-gay agenda in Massachusetts?
The other one that shows how misinformed and stupid people are was the group of voters who are are anti-establishment and upset at Bush. They went for McCain! He has been around since 1988. I don't even need to further explain the irony in this.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Another irony.... this was suppose to be the election of change. Both parties have as the front runner Washington insiders, McCain and Clinton. What change is possible with these two, you have their record. What you will be getting is more of the same.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The first time a black has made it this far and is only a step away from the nomination.
The first time a woman has made it this far and is only a step away from the nomination.
Early in the process there was two Italians and one was a cross dresser.
If Clinton and Huckabee win their parties nomination we will have two candidates from the same state, Arkansas. Who would win that battle in the bid for presidency?
After the scandal ridden era the Clinton's left Arkansas in, Hillary still beat Obama in that state. Once again people are stupid.
In the south Obama a black man is winning and in a predominately white state as Iowa he won also.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Its all about money
Its a shame, can you imagine if Huckabee had Mitts wallet? He would be running the table. He is very competitive now with hardly any ads being run. And he still refuses to take off his gloves and fight back. The man is so positive and good for this country.
As for Mitt, I don't hold it against him that he has money and is using it. What I find totally intolerable is the way he uses it to distort facts.
Clinton's is running low on money. Hillary said on Anderson Cooper that she lent her campaign $5 million and reiterated it in the same breath. Some of her campaign workers are now working without pay but she made sure it was known that she LENT the campaign money. Typical Clinton.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pat Buchanan its time to retire. When asked if Huckabee has any chance left Pat replied No, he has no where to go. The south is done.
Help me out here, is Louisiana in the south? What about Texas and Virginia? Or Mississippi, N.C. and Kentucky! Pat has no where to go except home to retire. Good night Pat!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I dedicate this to all the supposed Christians and friends of mine who think because I don't have a national show I am full of it.
In the I told you so category.
I told you to shut off the main stream media such as Ann Coulter. Her and Glen Beck have both come out publicly and said if McCain gets the nomination they will vote for Hilary! Its one thing to protest and maybe not vote or vote third party or even write in a candidate but to vote for Clinton is detestable. They have lost what little credibility they had.
Now the Republicans are running around as if the sky is falling because they are worried the Conservatives won't come out and vote. Why should we? The establishment, media and Mc & Mitt alienated us by their social stance and remember that Value Voters debate that they didn't attend, the debate I keep reminding everyone about? Its haunting them!!!!! I am still insulted. They won't be getting my vote either.
The anti-McCain cry I warned you about is at a higher fervor than even I expected. If he gets in he will do so with out the majority but about 35%. That's due to the crazy way the Republicans have the primaries set up in some states with the winner take all. Mc wouldn't be winning by such a large margin if the delegates won were proportionate.
And I said this to the point of redundancy, but will say it one more time, the way for the Republicans to win is with the Conservative Right, I encourage you to take a step back and look at Huckabee again. He is our only choice and hope!
And lastly in the I told you so.....
I said in May '07 the Establishment would push for McCain and he would win.
Lets pray I am wrong on this one.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lincoln and King Jr.
I got to thinking of Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr. If both were alive today they would have such mixed emotions to the point of heart ache. Both of them would of been excited to see a black man as president and both of them would be saddened that it is one who is pro-choice and as liberal as Obama.
Hope this gives you something to think about.
C.K.M
In Florida two things stood out.
Mitt received more votes from the Evangelicals then Mike Huckabee. Christian and Value Voters are buying the lie from the media and Romney's own ads that paint him as a social conservative. He isn't! Look into his record as Governor, only recently he changed. Mitt's Mother who ran for senate in Michigan was a pro-choice Republican. And do I even need to mention again his pro-gay agenda in Massachusetts?
The other one that shows how misinformed and stupid people are was the group of voters who are are anti-establishment and upset at Bush. They went for McCain! He has been around since 1988. I don't even need to further explain the irony in this.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Another irony.... this was suppose to be the election of change. Both parties have as the front runner Washington insiders, McCain and Clinton. What change is possible with these two, you have their record. What you will be getting is more of the same.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The first time a black has made it this far and is only a step away from the nomination.
The first time a woman has made it this far and is only a step away from the nomination.
Early in the process there was two Italians and one was a cross dresser.
If Clinton and Huckabee win their parties nomination we will have two candidates from the same state, Arkansas. Who would win that battle in the bid for presidency?
After the scandal ridden era the Clinton's left Arkansas in, Hillary still beat Obama in that state. Once again people are stupid.
In the south Obama a black man is winning and in a predominately white state as Iowa he won also.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Its all about money
Its a shame, can you imagine if Huckabee had Mitts wallet? He would be running the table. He is very competitive now with hardly any ads being run. And he still refuses to take off his gloves and fight back. The man is so positive and good for this country.
As for Mitt, I don't hold it against him that he has money and is using it. What I find totally intolerable is the way he uses it to distort facts.
Clinton's is running low on money. Hillary said on Anderson Cooper that she lent her campaign $5 million and reiterated it in the same breath. Some of her campaign workers are now working without pay but she made sure it was known that she LENT the campaign money. Typical Clinton.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Pat Buchanan its time to retire. When asked if Huckabee has any chance left Pat replied No, he has no where to go. The south is done.
Help me out here, is Louisiana in the south? What about Texas and Virginia? Or Mississippi, N.C. and Kentucky! Pat has no where to go except home to retire. Good night Pat!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I dedicate this to all the supposed Christians and friends of mine who think because I don't have a national show I am full of it.
In the I told you so category.
I told you to shut off the main stream media such as Ann Coulter. Her and Glen Beck have both come out publicly and said if McCain gets the nomination they will vote for Hilary! Its one thing to protest and maybe not vote or vote third party or even write in a candidate but to vote for Clinton is detestable. They have lost what little credibility they had.
Now the Republicans are running around as if the sky is falling because they are worried the Conservatives won't come out and vote. Why should we? The establishment, media and Mc & Mitt alienated us by their social stance and remember that Value Voters debate that they didn't attend, the debate I keep reminding everyone about? Its haunting them!!!!! I am still insulted. They won't be getting my vote either.
The anti-McCain cry I warned you about is at a higher fervor than even I expected. If he gets in he will do so with out the majority but about 35%. That's due to the crazy way the Republicans have the primaries set up in some states with the winner take all. Mc wouldn't be winning by such a large margin if the delegates won were proportionate.
And I said this to the point of redundancy, but will say it one more time, the way for the Republicans to win is with the Conservative Right, I encourage you to take a step back and look at Huckabee again. He is our only choice and hope!
And lastly in the I told you so.....
I said in May '07 the Establishment would push for McCain and he would win.
Lets pray I am wrong on this one.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Lincoln and King Jr.
I got to thinking of Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr. If both were alive today they would have such mixed emotions to the point of heart ache. Both of them would of been excited to see a black man as president and both of them would be saddened that it is one who is pro-choice and as liberal as Obama.
Hope this gives you something to think about.
C.K.M
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)