Monday, December 19, 2011

mitt gets religion - second look

Message body

Friends, let me set the table before you read this email from my archives. I am so glad I have saved all my old writings since all of what is playing out this election is really just a rewind of the '08 election season.

In this writing from 4 years ago the only names you have to change is Rudy Giuliani and replace it with Newt and Huckabee change that to Santorum whom I feel still will be rising to the top and shortly.

For those who may not remember Mitt Romney shunned the Value Voters Debate in Florida in Sept. '07 but when Huckabee made character and religion an issue he panicked and gave that ridiculous religion speech. Mitt's main foe at the time was Rudy until Huckabee rose up but this year Mitt's foe is Newt, and Santorum well he is the Huckabee that will be the Iowa surprise.

Be honest, wouldn't you rather of had Huckabee over a McCain and Obama? Well lets not be regretful again, lets support Santorum.

Give me your feedback.

Carey Masci

--- On Sat, 12/8/07, Carey Masci wrote:

From: Carey Masci

Subject: Mitt Gets Religion

To: "c k m"

Date: Saturday, December 8, 2007, 7:19 AM

Mitt Gets Religion

Did anyone one watch the PR event put on by Mitt? I didn't and I should of known this was coming. Mitt just doesn't get it. Why is he pulling out the religion card when no one brought it up? I'll tell you the reason, the reason is Governor Mike Huckabee, a candidate the Romney camp didn't figure on rising to the top. They now have someone else to contend with other than Rudy.

Suddenly Mitt Romney feels the need to verify his stance on his Mormon faith and God in general. I'm sorry the timing is wrong and way to late. Where was Mitt during the Value Voters debate in September? If he was so concerned that people understand his religion why didn't he attend it and make his beliefs known then? This issue would of been settled months ago. But now he is trying to look religious to the Conservative Right which was not a concern of his until Huckabee started wooing them to his side. Now its a priority.

There is two ways to go with your faith, you can either live it by example such as Rep. Ron Paul or you can come right out such as Allen Keyes or Mike Huckabee have and say this is my faith and what I believe. But for Mitt to give a speech weeks before the primaries open is an act of desperation.

Mitt doesn't understand that his Mormon religion is not as much of a concern as him changing positions on issues, especially on moral and social importance. I am not a Catholic or a Baptist but would vote for Allen Keyes or Mike Huckabee as our religions agree on whats most important from one God, the Virgin birth, Jesus, the crucifixion and resurrection. Likewise I may vote for a moral conscience Mormon BUT one that is consistent with his beliefs.

Which Mitt should we believe in, the one that now says he is pro-life and family or the previous one that was pro-choice and supporter of the homosexual lifestyle? If as he says he is now pro-life and family did this conversion come on suddenly and recent or was he dishonest in his views running for Senate and Governor of Massachusetts and lied to get elected? Either way can we trust him that his beliefs are genuine and cemented to the right or will he change back once elected?

Same with the issue of illegals. Mitt attacked Mayor Rudy Giuliani for NY city being a sanctuary city but in Massachusetts the state he was governor there were three sanctuary cities plus he had illegals working at his mansion. These are the reasons why Mitt Romney is falling and Mike Huckabee is rising to the top not because of his Mormon religion. It has to do with character and being firm in beliefs. I have never heard Rep. Ron Paul waiver in his views or Mike Huckabee, that's what America is looking for, a leader with a strong stance.

Since Mitt brought up the religion card I will leave him with Matthew 5:37 which reads: But let your ‘Yes’ be ‘Yes,’ and your ‘No,’ ‘No. Or saying it in modern political language it would read simply: Don't be a flip flopper.

Carey K. Masci

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

just a few intersting tidbits

Hey Gang,
I think we are all still in disbelief that Herman Cain dropped out. I thought for sure he was going to say I decided to take my talents and join Dwayne Wade in South Beach.

The public just never fails to amaze me. When Cain's supposed 13 year affair leaked out many of his supporters went to Gingrich who has had as many affairs if not more than Cain.

Obama's new way to tally unemployment is if a person after three months has not found work it is assumed he doesn't want a job and taken off the unemployment list. By doing it this way unemployment will be well below -2% by mid 2012.

Mitt Romney is questioning Newt Gingrich on issues of character. Newt went from being a Lutheran, to Baptist to now being Catholic. Unlike Mitt who has believed in one religion his whole life, even if its a false religion.

Awww I can't help but bring up this old dirt on Mitt, remember when he said he marched with Martin Luther King Jr.? No punch line, I still think its funny.

Perry finally remembered the departments he would cut, but now a new problem, he can't remember why he would cut them.

Who wants to make a $10,000.00 bet? I bet Mitt Romney never read his own book.

Mitt as pres would make an excellent negotiator. I can see him now, I bet you $10,000 Iran has nukes.

That's it for this round.
Carey Masci

heartwarming facts about mitt

Every time I hear Mitt say family values I want to throw up.  He has no clue what that means.  A man of values understands the harm done not only to society but the heart and soul of an individual who practices same sex.

Please please please study the link below before voting for this man.

Do you think this is right????
 2000-2002: As head of Salt Lake City Olympic Committee, Romney banned Boy Scouts from participating.
Well do you?????

Gay men and men who have sex with men face an increased risk of specific health concerns....
Men who have sex with men are at increased risk of contracting HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, as well as other sexually transmitted infections, including gonorrhea, chlamydia and syphilis
Vaccinations can protect you from hepatitis A and hepatitis B, serious liver infections that can spread through sexual contact.
There's no cure for HIV/AIDS and many sexually transmitted infections, such as human papillomavirus (HPV) and genital herpes. The best way to stay healthy is to protect yourself.
Gay men and men who have sex with men might be at higher risk of depression and anxiety. In addition, youth who identify themselves as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender might have a higher risk of depression and attempted suicide. 
 taken from the Mayo Clinic website

Knowing all this and the added health care cost not only for individuals but the whole country, because ALL of us do pay for this behavior, what man of morals or values supports this kind of life style?  Ask Mitt because I don't.

 Carey Masci


Saturday, December 10, 2011

Has Glenn Beck been listening to Carey

Friends just about what I have been saying since I made my decision to vote Santorum for president back in April Glenn Beck now echos.
I have been calling Mitt the white Obama and Beck - well, he calls Newt almost the same thing without coming right out and saying it.  But Beck does one up me and calls Newt a progressive
And what does Beck says about Mitt?  He would have a horrific time voting for him.  As I said all along, Mitt is establishment and IF ITS MITT - I SIT! 
Glenn's take on Paul and Santorum?  He is between the two, you can't argue with Paul on fiscal and Constitutional matters but concerning Israel he is with Santorum who he is a big fan of.  I have said that all along.
I will add two more reasons for Santorum, the national security issue of homosexuality and drugs.    YES those two are national security issues.  Paul is to lax on them.
So Tea Party people, the tea party is suppose to be about values, moral, God, country, Constitution, fiscal responsibility.
We found our candidate, its now time to support him.  And NO MORE I like Santorum but he can't win so I like Newt or Mitt.  You are playing right into their socialist web.
Stop saying it and start supporting Santorum.
Carey Masci
 Listen to Glenn Beck here with Judge Napolitano terrific clip about Newt:
Listen to Sarah Palin here:
More from Glenn Beck;_ylt=A0oG7h0o..JOZTMAv7hXNyoA?p=santorum%20is%20the%20next%20goerge%20washington&fr2=piv-web
On Rush
Rev. Cary Gordon
What does Newt say about Santorum

Saturday, December 03, 2011

know the candidates -RICK SANTORUM  (interesting article from 2003 think of where we are now with anti Israel and Jewish sentiment around the world)

''How is it possible, I wonder, to believe in the existence of God yet refuse to express outrage when his moral code is flouted?' To have faith in God, but to reject moral absolutes? How is it possible that there exists so little space in the public square for expressions of faith and the standards that follow from belief in a transcendent God?''

Rick Santorum

The Decision

Today we will find out whether Herman Cain decides to continue his run for the White House or pack it in. I am not a Cain fan because I do not think he is knowledgeable enough for the world stage, his past endorsement of Romney and today’s pr event of whether he will stay in but none the less I find it troubling with what is going on with our system. Politics have always been dirty but has America hit a new low?

In the 70's we had Nixon trying to get dirt on the Democrats with the Watergate break in. In the early 90's Ross Perot ended his bid for presidency when rumors surfaced that the Republican party planned on sabotaging Perot's daughters wedding. And now we have Cain.

The only candidate I know of that escaped infidelity charges was Slick Willy Clinton. In the 80's we had Gary Hart and he quickly became a casualty when it came to light of his cheating. And during the the 2008 election John Edwards sunk when it was revealed he got a woman pregnant. But with Cain this seems to be different. Herman's accusers do not seem the most credible but so much dirt has been thrown around and the waters have been so muddied that Cain could repeatedly say he is innocent but will we ever know the truth or trust him completely? It doesn't take a lot to character assassinate someone, doubt will always linger even if proven innocent.

Something really needs to be done with our campaigning and election process. NO one is perfect, most of us have a past and to some its a past we like to forget. But how far back into ones past do we have to go to see if a candidate qualifies to our standards? To me the time line is ten to fifteen years which I believe is sufficient to set a pattern of behavior. So the previous charges again Cain were a non factor as far as I am concerned but this supposed current affair has been going on thirteen years, that's worrisome.

It is unsettling because if we back the man and we find out these charges are true then the Republican party, the party of Value Voters, the Christian Conservative Right are no better than when the Democrats elected Clinton while the talk of his womanizing was going that continued right into the Oval Office. Do we really need this all over again?

On the other hand if we do not support Cain and then we find out that the charges were trumped up by the establishment, the insiders, the opposition, or by whomever then they won and damaged a mans reputation and maybe a person who would of done an admirable job as president and this could even discourage others in the future of running.

I myself will be watching Cain's decision. If he decides to end his campaign I will pay attention to whom he endorses. If he endorses someone such as Mitt Romney who is very soft on social issues and changed his position on so many others then I think I can draw a positive conclusion of what happened.

Carey Masci