Jan Brewer, that's where I
left off on March 4th. Well what do you
think of Governor Brewer’s decision to veto SB 1062? SB 1062 would have allowed a person or
business to refuse service to homosexuals and lesbians if it violated their
religious beliefs. That’s a very
condensed version of the bill.
Brewer
along with many others right now have totally lost their understanding of the
first amendment and what is morally correct.
A person should have the option not to give service to an individual if
they feel it violates their religious beliefs.
The media and those who are bent on driving any sort of religion from America have found the way to do this by beating into our
subconscious that homosexuals are the same as any other ethnic minority. Regardless of what they say and how they try
to promote it, homosexuality is not a race, nationality or even a person, it is
a behavior; and if one’s business is such where serving a same sex couple will
legitimize their relationship such as a bed & breakfast or a church just to
name two out of many the proprietor should be allowed to refuse.
But should we be surprised by a Republican
governor ruling as such? Not at
all. It was another Republican governor
from California named Ronald Reagan who vetoed a similar bill called
the Briggs Initiative which would have barred homosexuals and lesbians from
teaching in California public schools.
That veto gave footing and confidence to radical homosexual to push
forward their agenda.
There is so much more to this
constant promoting of homosexuality than two people loving each other. There is population control by the save the
earth people and control the people by globalist’s who would love to see our
Republic fall. How is the homosexual
movement part of the globalist’s plan?
Confuse the masses especially the young of what is right, lowering of
standards and morals, and push out religion under the guise that it is
hindering ones freedom. When everything
unravels it is fertile ground for a dictator or communist government to step in
to take control of the confusion.
Is that why Obama is pushing so hard promoting
homosexuality? Is it more than him
possibly being one? Or are the two
combined?
In the book the Secret Society
by Jan Karski lowering of morals was one of Hitlers weapons to control Poland. Karski also wrote there was one concentration
camp they feared the most, it was the one with the homosexual prison guards.
An excerpt from it:
It’s
commonly accepted that Hitler targeted homosexuals for extermination — just as
he did the Jews. "Not so,"
says Stephan Ross, the Newton resident who
is the founder of the Holocaust Museum in Boston. And
he should know. Ross was there. He lived, and almost died, in Nazi prison camps
from the age of 9 to 14. And while the abuse of the Nazis took many
forms, he says he was sexually molested more than once by homosexual Nazi prison
guards. He knew it was also going on with other prisoners, "although I
didn’t go looking for it." He estimates that about 20 percent of those
guarding Jewish prisoners were homosexual. And he says that Hitler may have
taken a public stance against homosexuals, but he believes that stance was
simply a device to round up Catholic priests or others Hitler wanted to remove
from society.
The homosexual agenda that is
being forced upon us has a far more sinister side. Is it done to take our eyes off of the impending economic doom or the government
and its one world order plans? Could militant homosexuals who threaten
everyone and anything that oppose them could they be used for the revival of
Storm Troopers that crush Christians and the Christian way of life to implement
all of this? History does repeat itself
and man never learns.
Next
About the Malaysian airplane,
this is my thinking from the beginning. Terrorism is a proud evil. If it
was any of the main Jihadist groups or one of many militant Islam factions they
would be hailing this victory, something else is at stake. Can this be a plot for us to get the go ahead
to bomb Iran?
To be continued.....
Carey Masci
